Files
bruno 75906e59de docs: add comprehensive Sprint 3 planning document
Sprint 3 Focus: Infrastructure as Code + Testing Framework

Key Issues:
- #16: Complete Testing Framework (5-6 days)
- #20: Infrastructure as Code - Terraform + Helm (5-6 days)
- #17: Enhanced CI Pipeline (2-3 days)
- #25: Auto Documentation Publishing (3-4 days)
- #24: Enhanced Security Scanning (3-4 days)
- #23: Performance Testing Suite (3-4 days)

Sprint Duration: 2 weeks (10 days)
Planned Commitment: 15-19 days of work
Success Criteria: >80% test coverage, IaC operational, CI <5min

🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <[email protected]>
2025-12-31 13:12:04 +08:00

14 KiB

Sprint 3 Planning - Infrastructure & Testing

Sprint Duration: Week 5-6 (2 weeks) Start Date: 2025-12-31 Target Completion: 2025-01-14 Focus: Infrastructure as Code + Complete Testing Framework


📊 Sprint Overview

Sprint Goal: Establish production-ready infrastructure and comprehensive testing framework

Key Objectives:

  1. Implement Infrastructure as Code (Terraform + Helm)
  2. Build complete testing framework (Unit + Integration + E2E)
  3. Enhance CI pipeline with parallel execution and caching
  4. Set up automated documentation publishing

Success Criteria:

  • Infrastructure reproducible via code
  • Test coverage >80%
  • CI pipeline <5 minutes
  • Documentation auto-deployed

🎯 Sprint 3 Issues (6 issues)

Priority 1: Foundation (Must Have)

Issue #16: Complete Testing Framework

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P0-Critical Estimated Effort: 5-6 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Build comprehensive test suite covering unit, integration, and E2E tests with >80% coverage.

Deliverables:

  • Unit tests with pytest
    • Test all models (User, Item, etc.)
    • Test all API endpoints
    • Test utility functions
    • Mock external dependencies
  • Integration tests
    • Database integration tests
    • API integration tests
    • External service integration tests
  • E2E tests with Playwright
    • User authentication flow
    • CRUD operations
    • Error handling scenarios
  • Test fixtures and factories
  • Coverage report (HTML + CI integration)
  • Test documentation

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Overall coverage >80%
  • Critical paths coverage >95%
  • All tests pass in CI
  • Test execution time <2 minutes

Technical Notes:

  • Use pytest-asyncio for async tests
  • Use pytest-mock for mocking
  • Use Playwright for E2E tests
  • Generate coverage with pytest-cov

Files to Create:

tests/
├── unit/
│   ├── test_models.py
│   ├── test_api_endpoints.py
│   └── test_utils.py
├── integration/
│   ├── test_database.py
│   ├── test_api_integration.py
│   └── test_external_services.py
├── e2e/
│   ├── test_auth_flow.py
│   ├── test_crud_operations.py
│   └── test_error_handling.py
├── conftest.py (fixtures)
└── factories.py (test data factories)

Dependencies: None


Issue #20: Infrastructure as Code (Terraform + K8s)

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P0-Critical Estimated Effort: 5-6 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Implement Infrastructure as Code for reproducible environments across dev/staging/prod.

Deliverables:

  • Terraform modules
    • Cloud provider setup (AWS/GCP/Azure)
    • Networking (VPC, subnets, security groups)
    • Kubernetes cluster provisioning
    • Database (RDS/Cloud SQL)
    • Object storage (S3/GCS)
    • Monitoring infrastructure
  • Helm charts
    • Application deployment chart
    • Database migration job
    • Monitoring stack (Prometheus, Grafana, Loki)
    • Ingress configuration
  • Environment configurations
    • terraform/environments/dev/
    • terraform/environments/staging/
    • terraform/environments/prod/
  • State management
    • Remote state backend (S3/GCS)
    • State locking (DynamoDB/Cloud Storage)
  • Cost optimization
    • Resource tagging
    • Auto-scaling policies
    • Spot instances for non-prod

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Infrastructure can be provisioned from scratch in <30 minutes
  • All environments have parity (same structure, different scale)
  • State is stored remotely and locked
  • Cost estimates documented

Technical Notes:

  • Use Terraform workspaces for environments
  • Use Helm values files for environment-specific configs
  • Document all variables and outputs
  • Include destroy procedures

Files to Create:

terraform/
├── modules/
│   ├── networking/
│   ├── kubernetes/
│   ├── database/
│   └── monitoring/
├── environments/
│   ├── dev/
│   ├── staging/
│   └── prod/
└── backend.tf

deployment/helm/gold-template/
├── templates/
│   ├── deployment.yaml
│   ├── service.yaml
│   ├── ingress.yaml
│   ├── configmap.yaml
│   └── secret.yaml
├── values-dev.yaml
├── values-staging.yaml
└── values-prod.yaml

Dependencies: None


Priority 2: Optimization (Should Have)

Issue #17: Enhanced CI Pipeline

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P1-High Estimated Effort: 2-3 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Optimize CI/CD workflows for faster feedback and better resource utilization.

Deliverables:

  • Parallel test execution
    • Split tests into groups
    • Run groups in parallel jobs
    • Aggregate results
  • Matrix builds
    • Python 3.10, 3.11, 3.12
    • Multiple OS (Ubuntu, macOS)
  • Caching strategies
    • pip dependencies cache
    • Docker layer cache
    • Test result cache
  • Fast feedback
    • Fail fast on linting errors
    • Run unit tests before integration tests
    • Skip unnecessary jobs on doc-only changes

Acceptance Criteria:

  • CI pipeline completes in <5 minutes
  • Cache hit rate >80%
  • Parallel execution reduces time by >50%

Technical Notes:

  • Use GitHub Actions matrix strategy
  • Use actions/cache for dependencies
  • Use Docker buildx for layer caching

Files to Update:

.github/workflows/
├── ci.yml (enhance existing)
└── test-matrix.yml (new)

Dependencies: Issue #16


Issue #25: Auto Documentation Publishing

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P1-High Estimated Effort: 3-4 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Automated documentation deployment with versioning and search.

Deliverables:

  • MkDocs setup
    • Material theme
    • Navigation structure
    • Code highlighting
    • Mermaid diagrams
  • Auto-deploy to GitHub Pages
    • Deploy on main branch push
    • Deploy on release tags
  • Versioned documentation
    • mike for version management
    • Version selector in UI
  • Search functionality
    • Built-in search
    • Search analytics
  • API documentation
    • Auto-generate from OpenAPI spec
    • Include examples and schemas

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Documentation auto-deploys on push
  • Multiple versions accessible
  • Search works across all pages
  • API docs auto-generated

Technical Notes:

  • Use MkDocs Material theme
  • Use mike for versioning
  • Use mkdocstrings for API docs from docstrings

Files to Create:

docs/
├── index.md
├── getting-started.md
├── api/
│   └── reference.md
├── guides/
│   ├── deployment.md
│   └── testing.md
└── architecture/
    └── overview.md

mkdocs.yml
.github/workflows/docs.yml

Dependencies: Issue #11 (documentation structure)


Priority 3: Nice to Have (Could Have)

Issue #24: Enhanced Security Scanning

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P2-Medium Estimated Effort: 3-4 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Comprehensive security automation covering SAST, DAST, container scanning, and secret detection.

Deliverables:

  • SAST (Static Application Security Testing)
    • Bandit for Python
    • Semgrep for custom rules
  • DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
    • OWASP ZAP for API testing
  • Container scanning
    • Trivy for vulnerabilities
    • Snyk for dependencies
  • Secret scanning
    • GitGuardian or TruffleHog
    • Pre-commit hooks
  • Security reports
    • Upload to GitHub Security tab
    • Generate SARIF reports

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All scans run in CI
  • Critical vulnerabilities block merge
  • Reports uploaded to GitHub Security
  • Pre-commit hooks prevent secret commits

Technical Notes:

  • Use GitHub Code Scanning for SARIF
  • Configure severity thresholds
  • Document remediation procedures

Files to Create:

.github/workflows/
├── security-scan.yml
└── secret-scan.yml

.pre-commit-config.yaml
security/
└── semgrep-rules.yml

Dependencies: None


Issue #23: Performance Testing Suite

Status: 🔴 Not Started Priority: P2-Medium Estimated Effort: 3-4 days Assignee: TBD

Description: Load and stress testing automation with performance budgets.

Deliverables:

  • k6 test scripts
    • Load tests (sustained traffic)
    • Stress tests (peak traffic)
    • Spike tests (sudden traffic)
    • Soak tests (long duration)
  • Performance benchmarks
    • Response time targets
    • Throughput targets
    • Error rate thresholds
  • CI integration
    • Run on PR (smoke tests)
    • Run on main (full suite)
    • Regression detection
  • Performance budgets
    • P95 latency <200ms
    • Throughput >1000 RPS
    • Error rate <0.1%

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Performance tests run in CI
  • Regressions detected automatically
  • Results visualized in dashboard
  • Budgets enforced

Technical Notes:

  • Use k6 for load testing
  • Use Grafana for visualization
  • Store results in InfluxDB

Files to Create:

tests/performance/
├── load-test.js
├── stress-test.js
├── spike-test.js
└── soak-test.js

.github/workflows/performance.yml
performance/
├── budgets.yml
└── thresholds.yml

Dependencies: Issue #16


📅 Sprint Timeline

Week 1 (Days 1-5)

Day 1-2: Setup & Planning

  • Sprint kickoff meeting
  • Environment setup
  • Issue refinement
  • Task breakdown

Day 3-5: Foundation Work

  • Start Issue #16 (Testing Framework)

    • Day 3: Unit tests setup + model tests
    • Day 4: API endpoint tests
    • Day 5: Integration tests setup
  • Start Issue #20 (Infrastructure as Code)

    • Day 3: Terraform module structure
    • Day 4: Networking + Kubernetes modules
    • Day 5: Database + monitoring modules

Week 2 (Days 6-10)

Day 6-7: Complete Foundation

  • Complete Issue #16

    • Day 6: E2E tests with Playwright
    • Day 7: Coverage report + documentation
  • Complete Issue #20

    • Day 6: Helm charts
    • Day 7: Environment configs + testing

Day 8-9: Optimization

  • Issue #17: Enhanced CI Pipeline

    • Day 8: Parallel execution + matrix builds
    • Day 9: Caching + fast feedback
  • Issue #25: Auto Documentation

    • Day 8: MkDocs setup + content
    • Day 9: Versioning + auto-deploy

Day 10: Sprint Review & Retrospective

  • Demo completed work
  • Update documentation
  • Sprint retrospective
  • Plan Sprint 4

🎯 Success Metrics

Code Quality

  • Test coverage >80%
  • All tests passing
  • No critical security vulnerabilities
  • Code review approval on all PRs

Infrastructure

  • Infrastructure provisioned via code
  • All environments deployed
  • Monitoring operational
  • Cost within budget

CI/CD

  • CI pipeline <5 minutes
  • Cache hit rate >80%
  • Deployment success rate >95%
  • Zero-downtime deployments

Documentation

  • All features documented
  • API docs auto-generated
  • Documentation deployed
  • Search functional

🚧 Risks & Mitigation

Risk 1: Infrastructure Complexity

Impact: High Probability: Medium Mitigation:

  • Start with minimal viable infrastructure
  • Use managed services where possible
  • Document all decisions
  • Have rollback plan

Risk 2: Test Coverage Time

Impact: Medium Probability: High Mitigation:

  • Prioritize critical paths first
  • Use test generators where possible
  • Parallelize test writing
  • Accept 80% coverage (not 100%)

Risk 3: CI Pipeline Performance

Impact: Medium Probability: Medium Mitigation:

  • Implement caching early
  • Profile slow tests
  • Use parallel execution
  • Consider self-hosted runners

📋 Definition of Done

An issue is considered "Done" when:

  • All deliverables completed
  • Code reviewed and approved
  • Tests written and passing
  • Documentation updated
  • Deployed to staging
  • Verified in staging
  • PR merged to main
  • Issue closed with summary

🔄 Sprint Ceremonies

Daily Standup (Async)

  • What did you complete yesterday?
  • What will you work on today?
  • Any blockers?

Sprint Review (Day 10)

  • Demo completed work
  • Gather feedback
  • Update backlog

Sprint Retrospective (Day 10)

  • What went well?
  • What could be improved?
  • Action items for next sprint

📊 Sprint Backlog

Issue Priority Effort Status Assignee
#16 P0 5-6d 🔴 Not Started TBD
#20 P0 5-6d 🔴 Not Started TBD
#17 P1 2-3d 🔴 Not Started TBD
#25 P1 3-4d 🔴 Not Started TBD
#24 P2 3-4d 🔴 Not Started TBD
#23 P2 3-4d 🔴 Not Started TBD

Total Estimated Effort: 21-30 days Sprint Capacity: 10 days (2 weeks) Planned Commitment: Issues #16, #20, #17, #25 (15-19 days)

Note: Issues #24 and #23 are stretch goals if time permits.


🎓 Learning Objectives

Technical Skills

  • Terraform module development
  • Helm chart creation
  • Playwright E2E testing
  • GitHub Actions optimization
  • MkDocs documentation

Process Skills

  • Infrastructure as Code best practices
  • Test-driven development
  • CI/CD optimization techniques
  • Documentation automation

📚 Resources

Documentation

Templates

  • .claude/templates/ - Code templates
  • .claude/prompts/ - Claude prompts for assistance

Tools

  • Terraform
  • Helm
  • pytest
  • Playwright
  • MkDocs
  • k6 (performance testing)

✅ Sprint 3 Checklist

Pre-Sprint

  • Sprint planning document created
  • Issues created in GitHub
  • Issues added to project board
  • Team capacity confirmed
  • Dependencies identified

During Sprint

  • Daily standups
  • Code reviews
  • Testing
  • Documentation
  • Deployment to staging

Post-Sprint

  • Sprint review
  • Sprint retrospective
  • Update metrics
  • Plan Sprint 4

Created: 2025-12-31 Sprint Start: 2025-12-31 Sprint End: 2025-01-14 Next Sprint: Sprint 4 (CD Pipeline + Blue-Green Deployment)

🚀 Ready to start Sprint 3!